EN – HRD

Mass Arrests Of Members Of The Gülen Movement

AS A METHOD OF COLLECTIVE GUILT AND PUNISHMENT
HRD is an esteemed non-governmental organisation established in Germany in 2018 by Turkish lawyers, former bureaucrats, and entrepreneurs who are political asylum seekers in Germany and Europe. With a deep understanding of the prevailing human rights violations and the culture of impunity in countries like Türkiye, HRD diligently employs diverse strategies at the national, regional, and international levels to effect lasting change and enhance the circumstances of the victims.
The association “Action for Refugee Aid e.V.” was founded in 2018 by Berliners and refugees who fell victim to political discrimination in Turkey. The aim of the association is, on the one hand, to support refugees in the asylum process and, on the other hand, to help refugees integrate into local society. Another task of the association is to make legal violations (such as persecution) and discrimination in the countries of origin public.

Download Pdf : Click here to download…

In Turkey, politically motivated detentions and arrests are carried out against Kurds and members of the Gülen Movement through mass trials and mass arrests. In these cases, suspects or defendants are detained and arrested collectively based on their membership of a particular group, not based on concrete acts committed. There is no individualisation of crimes and punishments. Merely belonging to a specific group is sufficient to be accused of being a ‘traitor’ and ‘enemy of the state’, and evidence and documents of guilt are produced and obtained after the arrest.
The members of the group are considered guilty in advance from the beginning. Therefore, it does not matter which act they have committed concretely. The individual is eliminated, and guilt is created against a group with a collective prejudice. The accusations are directed collectively against all defendants, and they are accused of destroying the country, collaborating with foreign enemies, attempting a coup d’état and being members of a terrorist organisation. It does not matter with which actions they have committed this offence. Although there must be an act, an act of an individual and that act must constitute a violation of the law in terms of criminal law, the completely legal activities of individuals, the books they read, their social media posts, how many children they have, whether they have had an abortion, whether 3 they have disabled children, with whom they chat, with whom they are housemates can be considered sufficient evidence to be shown as a member of a terrorist organisation.
A person’s right to liberty and security is considerably narrowed against political opponents, and even the most natural behaviour can be interpreted as a criminal offence through political interpretation. In many decisions by the United Nations Human Rights organisations so far, it has been found that ‘widespread and systematic imprisonment or other serious deprivation of liberty’ against members of the Gülen Movement has reached the level of crimes against humanity1.
Indeed, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention emphasises that mass detentions, mass arrests and mass sentences in Turkey are imposed collectively against a group without individualisation of offences and punishments. In its judgment on 94 military students sentenced to life imprisonment in relation to the events of 15 July 2016, it stated that ‘mass trials are contrary

EN Rapor

We Answered the Questions of Our Friends Whose Asylum Applications Were Rejected – And Helped Clarify Their Roadmap

The asylum process in Germany presents not only legal but also emotional and social challenges for many individuals. In such a difficult and uncertain time, we consider it both a human and institutional responsibility to stand by our friends whose asylum applications have been rejected — to offer them guidance, support, and renewed hope.

To that end, we organized an online seminar specifically tailored for individuals facing rejection in the asylum process. The seminar focused on the complex structures of the German asylum system, the legal possibilities available after a negative decision, and concrete next steps they could take moving forward.

Rejection does not necessarily mean the end of the road. In fact, many individuals are not rejected because they lack valid grounds, but because they encountered procedural barriers: some did not understand the formal requirements, others struggled to present their experiences clearly due to emotional trauma, and many were unable to provide sufficient evidence or missed critical deadlines. As a result, the denial of asylum can lead to feelings of despair and helplessness — and it is precisely at this point that we stepped in to offer support.

In our seminar, we went beyond simply presenting general legal information. We helped participants assess their individual situations, understand their options, and make informed decisions. We explained how to file appeals, what is required during legal proceedings, how to prepare supporting documents, and the timelines involved. In addition, we presented alternative pathways such as the Ausbildungsduldung (tolerated stay for vocational training), residence permits through marriage, and other options under §25a and §25b of the Residence Act.

The event greatly benefited from the insights of our distinguished speakers. Our association’s chairperson, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Demir, opened the seminar with encouraging remarks, emphasizing the importance of unity and collective strength. Legal expert Prof. Dr. Mehmet Özcan provided a comprehensive yet accessible overview of German asylum and immigration law. Attorney Atilla Öztürk focused on the procedural aspects of dealing with the BAMF (Federal Office for Migration and Refugees) and the administrative courts, sharing practical advice and answering participants’ specific legal questions.

However, the seminar was more than just an informational session — it was an act of solidarity. Many participants shared their personal experiences, encouraged one another, and discovered the power of standing together. Events like this are crucial in overcoming isolation and rebuilding confidence among those navigating an uncertain legal journey.

As an organization, we reaffirm our commitment to being present in every field and continuing to support the victims of human rights violations. We will keep providing legal education, information sessions, and guidance to those in need. A rejection does not mean someone is undeserving — it only means that the path to justice must be pursued further. And we will walk this path together.

Press release: “The Council of Europe must now take concrete action against Turkey”

In Strasbourg, France, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Demir made a remarkable press statement on behalf of Human Rights Defenders (HRD) as part of the “March for Justice” against Turkey, which is failing to implement the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In his statement before the Council of Europe, Demir explained that Turkey has systematically refused to implement the decisions of the ECHR for years, causing not only a legal crisis but also a moral one.

Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Demir addressed the assembled crowd after handing over a letter on behalf of HRD to the representatives of the Council of Europe. Demir began his speech with the words: “We will not wait any longer. Our demand for justice cannot be postponed. Turkey is taking advantage of the Council of Europe’s patience. The disregard for the judgments of the ECtHR threatens not only the victims in Turkey, but also the integrity of the European legal system.”

“Turkey is playing for time and testing the seriousness of the Council of Europe.”

In his press statement, Prof. Dr. Demir emphasized that Turkey, particularly in view of the binding decisions of the ECtHR, no longer acts as a “playmaker” but as a “perpetrator trying to gain time.” Dr. Demir emphasized in his press statement that, in view of the binding decisions of the ECtHR, Turkey no longer acts as a ‘playmaker’ but as a “perpetrator trying to gain time.” “In an environment where the Constitutional Court has been suspended and the judiciary has been politicized, the decisions from Strasbourg are either ignored in Turkey or rendered ineffective by years of delaying tactics,” he said.

Demir pointed out that the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers must apply more effective mechanisms in this regard. “The monitoring procedure of the Committee of Ministers should not be limited to reporting violations; in cases of repeated violations, sanction mechanisms must be applied urgently,” he said.

“The suspension of membership must be put on the agenda.”

Demir continued: “If the Council of Europe remains inactive in the face of this blatant disregard for its own decisions, it will set a dangerous precedent not only for Turkey but for all member states. The Council must consider all possible measures against Turkey, which is failing to implement the decisions of the ECtHR, including the suspension of its membership. For silence in the face of legal violations means that these violations are legitimized,” he explained.

Legal basis outlined

In his speech, Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Demir referred to Article 46 of the European Convention on Human Rights and explained: “Every contracting state has recognized the decisions of the ECtHR as binding. Turkey is clearly violating this article and is systematically resisting it,” he said.

Demir also recalled the proceedings 46/4 initiated by the Committee of Ministers against Azerbaijan in 2017 for failing to implement the decisions of the ECtHR, and reiterated his call for concrete steps, saying, “A similar process has now become inevitable for Turkey as well.”

“Thousands of victims, dozens of violations”

In his press statement, Demir also summarized the most important decisions of the ECtHR in Turkey and described the failure to implement the decisions on Selahattin Demirtaş and Osman Kavala in particular as unlawful political resistance. “Even though these two examples are symbolic, in reality thousands of people are suffering from injustice. Journalists, academics, civil society representatives, and even teachers are unjustly imprisoned. The ECtHR’s rulings on violations of rights point to a systematic problem,” he said.

“The conscience of Europe must see this crisis”

Demir concluded by appealing to the European public and civil society: “Today, we are raising our voices not only for the victims in Turkey, but also for the future of the European legal order. If these judgments are not implemented, the justice of Strasbourg will remain purely symbolic. The conscience of Europe must recognize this crisis.”

After Demir’s speech, the crowd applauded loudly and at length. Human rights activists continued their march and held up banners in front of the ECHR building with the slogan “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied.”

This statement is seen as a turning point, a loud reminder of the steps that European institutions must take in response to Turkey’s violation of its international obligations.

HRD e.V. Makes a Powerful Stand in Strasbourg: Human Rights Organizations Call for Sanctions Against Turkey

We are determined!

On June 25, 2025, numerous international human rights organizations gathered in Strasbourg for a historic protest march — and we at HRD – Human Rights Defenders e.V. actively participated as one of the leading umbrella organizations. This determined action sent a clear signal against the ongoing disregard of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) by Turkey.

For years, HRD e.V. has been documenting and analyzing systematic human rights violations, particularly regarding political trials, freedom of expression, torture, and arbitrary detentions in Turkey. The Turkish government’s failure to implement final ECtHR rulings is an alarming example of how the rule of law and European core values are being undermined.

A Protest with Impact – Our Role in Strasbourg

The demonstration in Strasbourg was more than a symbolic protest — it was the result of months of civil society collaboration and intensive preparation. HRD e.V. played a key role in conceptualizing and organizing the event. Together with our partner organizations, we not only helped coordinate logistics but also contributed substantial content: We were among the few specialized organizations to prepare and submit official letters and legally grounded demands to the bodies of the Council of Europe and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE).

Our delegation handed over several dossiers documenting Turkey’s systematic non-implementation of ECtHR rulings. Particularly highlighted were prominent cases like Osman Kavala and Selahattin Demirtaş, whose continued detention despite ECtHR decisions represents a clear breach of the European Convention on Human Rights.

For Justice and International Law – Our Demand

In our statements, together with our partners, we call on the Council of Europe and its member states to initiate concrete sanction mechanisms against Turkey as long as these ECtHR rulings are ignored. This is not only a legal necessity but a matter of justice and solidarity with the countless victims of political repression.

However, our work does not end with this demonstration. The Strasbourg action is part of a larger HRD e.V. strategy to raise awareness about human rights violations in Turkey at the European level. Through our ongoing “Human Rights Monitor” project, continuous analyses, and targeted lobbying activities, we advocate for a Europe where respect for human rights is non-negotiable.

A Strong Network – A Strong Commitment

Participation in the Strasbourg demonstration marks another milestone in HRD e.V.’s history — and a clear sign of our growing international network. The visibility and recognition of our work within European institutions and media confirm our course and motivate us to stand even more resolutely for the rights of the oppressed.

We thank all supporters, volunteers, and partner organizations who made this action possible. Together we show: Human rights are indivisible — and their defense knows no borders.

EN Strasbourg

International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, 26 June

Press Release: International Day in Support of Victims of Torture
26.06.2023

BERLIN – As the world observes the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture on 26 June, HRD e.V. stands in solidarity with survivors of torture, reaffirming our commitment to the prevention and eradication of this heinous crime.

Torture is a grave violation of human rights, a deplorable act that inflicts severe physical and psychological pain on individuals. It leaves lasting scars, traumatizing victims and undermining the very fabric of society. On this important day, we raise our collective voices to advocate for the rights and dignity of torture survivors and to condemn torture in all its forms.

Our organization recognizes that the eradication of torture requires a multi-faceted approach. We call upon governments worldwide to uphold their obligations under international law, particularly the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. We urge states to implement robust legal frameworks, strengthen oversight mechanisms, and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions.

In the context of Turkey, we note with concern the reports of human rights violations and allegations of torture. It is crucial for the Turkish government to ensure the protection of human rights and to thoroughly investigate any allegations of torture or ill-treatment. We call upon the authorities to take swift and transparent action to address these concerns and to provide justice and reparations to the victims.

We also emphasize the crucial role of civil society organizations, healthcare providers, and human rights defenders in supporting survivors of torture in Turkey. It is imperative to create a conducive environment where survivors can access comprehensive and specialized rehabilitative services, including medical care, psychological support, legal aid, and social reintegration programs.

Education and awareness play vital roles in preventing torture. HRD e.V. is dedicated to raising public awareness about the consequences of torture and the urgent need to combat it, including in Turkey. We encourage educational institutions, media outlets, and online platforms in Turkey to join us in promoting human rights education, fostering empathy, and challenging the culture of impunity that allows torture to persist.

On this International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, let us come together as a global community and reaffirm our commitment to promoting human dignity, justice, and compassion. We stand in solidarity with survivors of torture, supporting their healing journey and advocating for a world free from this abhorrent practice, including in Turkey.

HRD e.V.

TURKEY: ARBITRARY MASS DETENTIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

That authoritarian regimes intimidate, threaten or even carry out (or commission) assassinations against critical voices is no secret.

Silencing opposition or disagreeable figures such as journalists, human rights activists is of immense importance to autocrats and dictators for whom they are a thorn in the flesh. They are a threat to the arbitrariness of these rulers. The rulers have various apparatuses at their disposal to meet their aspirations in this regard.

One of these instruments, which the Turkish state implements today, is the mass wave of arrests, which is mainly directed at the Gülen movement.

Since 2014, the Turkish state apparatus has been targeting the Gülen movement and its sympathizers. One of the main tools used by the Turkish security authorities and judiciary is the daily waves of arbitrary arrests of people accused of being inspired by Gülen.

In total, more than 6,140 waves of mass arrests were carried out between 2014 and 2022, and more than 140,000 people were detained. On average, up to 60 people are detained every day in at least three operations.

In addition, we observe that more and more people are arrested for humanitarian aid. For example, on October 18, 2022, a new stage of unlawful arrests was initiated against 704 people -men, women, young and old- on the grounds that they were “trying to help the families of those in prison or released from prison”. This has unfortunately been the case for more than 3 years regarding the Gülen movement.

In our HRDfactsheet we have summarized facts and figures why this is to be judged as a crime against humanity and made various recommendations to remedy these human rights violations.

Erdbeben in der Türkei & Syrien

Wir unterstützen die Spendenaktion des karitativen Vereins Time to Help e.V., der seit vielen Jahren in unterschiedlichen Krisengebieten humanitäre Hilfe leistet. Aktuell wurde ein Spendenkonto eingerichtet, um mit Spenden den Betroffenen vor Ort so schnell wie möglich zu helfen. Spenden Sie jetzt und unterstützen Sie diese Arbeit!

Bitte den QR-Code scannen um auf die website der Time To Help e.V. zu gelangen oder auf den Button unten clicken.

Die Weltweite Hexenjagd

Nirgends sicher vor Präsident Erdogan und seinem Machtapparat

Dass autoritäre Regime kritische Stimmen auch im Ausland einschüchtern, bedrohen oder gar gegen diese Attentate ausüben (oder in Auftrag geben) ist kein Geheimnis.

Oppositionelle oder unliebsame Persönlichkeiten wie Exiljournalisten grenzüberschreitend zum Schweigen zu bringen, ist für Autokraten und Diktatoren, denen sie ein Dorn im Auge sind, von immenser Bedeutung. Sie sind eine Gefahr für die Willkür in den jeweiligen Heimatländern. Die Machthaber verfügen über verschiedene Apparate, um ihren diesbezüglichen Bestrebungen nachzukommen. Wir stellen auch fest, dass Regierungen, die für grenzüberschreitende Unterdrückung bekannt sind, sich gegenseitig dabei unterstützen, Aktivisten und andere Exilanten einzuschüchtern, zu belästigen und zu schädigen.

Die grenzüberschreitende Repressionskampagne des türkischen Staates ist nicht nur wegen ihrer Intensität in den letzten Jahren, sondern auch wegen ihrer geographischen Ausdehnung im negativen Sinne bemerkenswert. In dem Maße, in dem sich die Türkei unter Präsident Erdoğan immer mehr zu einem gefestigten autoritären Staat entwickelt hat, in dem sich die überwältigende Macht im Präsidentenamt konzentriert, ist auch die Praxis der grenzüberschreitenden Repression extremer geworden.

Die türkische Regierung hat in ihren transnationalen Repressionsoperationen vor allem zwei Gruppen im Visier: die PKK, im weiteren Sinne regierungskritische Kurdinnen und Kurden, sowie die Gülen-Bewegung – und damit auch deren Sympathisantinnen und Sympathisanten.

In unserem HRDpaper werden wir die Politik und die Methoden der AKP-Regierung und Präsident Erdogans im Zusammenhang mit der kürzlich aktualisierten „Fahndungsliste für mutmaßliche Terroristen“ des türkischen Innenministeriums unter die Lupe nehmen. Wie Sie sehen werden, finden sich auf den aktualisierten, farblich kodierten Listen nun auch Exil-Journalisten wie Cevheri Güven und Can Dündar. Auch deutsche StaatsbürgerInnen, die hier geboren, aufgewachsen, studiert und beruflich erfolgreich sind, stehen auf der Liste.

Türkei & Interpol : Fakten und Erkenntnisse

THE TERM OF THE INQUIRY COMMISSION ON THE STATE OF EMERGENCY MEASURES (ICSEM) IS ENDING

The closure of the ICSEM is important, but there is no concrete change in favor of the victims...

The ICSEM, has taken away people’s faith in the law. In some cases, the ICSEM did not recognize the decision of the Constitutional Court, for example the prominent cases of the ‘Peace Academics’ who were dismissed for signing the ‘Peace Declaration’ were not reinstated.

Furthermore, the ICSEM, committed a constitutional violation and the right for a fair trial was usurped for six years. The abolition of the ICSEM will not fix anything. The ICSEM made many decisions based on the ‘opinion of the institution’. Now those institutions will take judicial action. What really needs to be solved is for citizens to have the right to a fair trial. The institutional opinion is scandalous from the beginning. It is not clear who is authorized to issue this “institutional opinion”. It is an abstract evaluation. Now the Government is authorizing the institutions that gave those opinions, not to mention that there is no legal definition for the “institutional opinion” in the law.

Closing the ICSEM after 6 years and reassigning it to institutions will prolong the process even more. Institutions will also create a new unit for the files they have received. 6 years of unlawfulness of the ICSEM will be continued within the Ministries or relevant State Departments.

Unless there is a change in the understanding, it does not make much difference whether the ICSEM is abolished or handed over to the Ministries.

The judicial process needs to be accelerated. For 7 years, there are decisions pending in administrative courts. Not only the commission but also the administrative and appeal courts are politicized. Whatever the ICSEM decides, the courts make subjective decisions without any legal evaluation. The closure of the ICSEM is important, but there is no concrete change in favor of the victims.